The Discerning Texan
All that is necessary for evil to triumph, is for good men to do nothing.
-- Edmund Burke
-- Edmund Burke
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
Massive inner-city voter fraud uncovered
When looking for sources for news that is both highly impactful and also ahead of the curve, I return daily to The American Thinker, because these folks, led by editor Thomas Lifson, have a knack for sniffing out really important stories, including stories the mainstream elitists for whatever reason are burying or refusing to print.
The contributors to this blog come from all over, and I have yet to see one source writing for this blog whose credentials are not impeccable. There is a center-right point of view to this site (but let's be honest: what news organization today does not have a point of view?); nevertheless all of the news and ideas here are presented in a reasonable, non vitriolic tone, and the stories and sources are always backed up with facts that lead the reader to draw his/her own conclusions.
In my own opinion, the site focuses on topics that are of greatest concern and critical importance in our world: defeating tyranny and worldwide terror, defending Western civilization, advancing American interests at home and abroad, fighting for a sound economy, defeating world socialism/marxism, and exposing fraud and corruption wherever it exists in our government and our society.
So today, when I came across yet another blockbuster story from The American Thinker, I had to do something beyond simply referencing the story, because if you do not have a permanant link to The American Thinker, it ought to be; if this is not a daily stop in your surfing rountine, you are missing out on some of the most thoughtful, insightful, and hard-hitting writing on the web.
Today's piece by Selwyn Duke on the uncovering of massive inner-city voter fraud on behalf of Democrats is not shocking to me (who have suspected this for sometime), but it is outrageous. Duke's conclusions follow, but the detail supporting it is worth your time as well:
I was contacted recently by a source (who wishes to remain anonymous) who is a local Washington, D.C. community leader and who has “done some computer work for several candidates over the years in DC.” He is also a man who has conducted his own study of vote-fraud in the inner-city. Close-up, and definitely not for attribution. I will dub this source “Deep Vote.” Deep Vote told me that in a previous article I had missed the most important single factor of all, one that logically explains why the majority of vote fraud takes place in the inner cities, and benefits Democrats. There has been a lot of controversy recently about comparative vote fraud.
Experience has taught Deep Vote that it is transiency which provides Democrat political operatives with the most golden of opportunities to steal votes. In depressed urban areas an inordinate number of residents move in and out every year, with some taking up residence for only a brief time. Stability is less common among the poverty-stricken and others suffering social dysfunctions, and such people are more numerous in large urban areas than elsewhere.
A high rate of transiency inevitably leaves a large number of people who no longer live in an area on the voter rolls. The local authorities, says Deep Vote, “are always somewhat late on removing non-residents.” All the Democrat operatives need do then is ascertain who these people are and vote for them. Deep Vote explains the mechanics of this process.
The mechanics are well worth your time, but the overriding truth is that Democrats have been trying to steal elections for years. Thanks to investigative reporting teams like The American Thinker, Americans are finally beginning to wake up to the ugly truth.
The contributors to this blog come from all over, and I have yet to see one source writing for this blog whose credentials are not impeccable. There is a center-right point of view to this site (but let's be honest: what news organization today does not have a point of view?); nevertheless all of the news and ideas here are presented in a reasonable, non vitriolic tone, and the stories and sources are always backed up with facts that lead the reader to draw his/her own conclusions.
In my own opinion, the site focuses on topics that are of greatest concern and critical importance in our world: defeating tyranny and worldwide terror, defending Western civilization, advancing American interests at home and abroad, fighting for a sound economy, defeating world socialism/marxism, and exposing fraud and corruption wherever it exists in our government and our society.
So today, when I came across yet another blockbuster story from The American Thinker, I had to do something beyond simply referencing the story, because if you do not have a permanant link to The American Thinker, it ought to be; if this is not a daily stop in your surfing rountine, you are missing out on some of the most thoughtful, insightful, and hard-hitting writing on the web.
Today's piece by Selwyn Duke on the uncovering of massive inner-city voter fraud on behalf of Democrats is not shocking to me (who have suspected this for sometime), but it is outrageous. Duke's conclusions follow, but the detail supporting it is worth your time as well:
I was contacted recently by a source (who wishes to remain anonymous) who is a local Washington, D.C. community leader and who has “done some computer work for several candidates over the years in DC.” He is also a man who has conducted his own study of vote-fraud in the inner-city. Close-up, and definitely not for attribution. I will dub this source “Deep Vote.” Deep Vote told me that in a previous article I had missed the most important single factor of all, one that logically explains why the majority of vote fraud takes place in the inner cities, and benefits Democrats. There has been a lot of controversy recently about comparative vote fraud.
Experience has taught Deep Vote that it is transiency which provides Democrat political operatives with the most golden of opportunities to steal votes. In depressed urban areas an inordinate number of residents move in and out every year, with some taking up residence for only a brief time. Stability is less common among the poverty-stricken and others suffering social dysfunctions, and such people are more numerous in large urban areas than elsewhere.
A high rate of transiency inevitably leaves a large number of people who no longer live in an area on the voter rolls. The local authorities, says Deep Vote, “are always somewhat late on removing non-residents.” All the Democrat operatives need do then is ascertain who these people are and vote for them. Deep Vote explains the mechanics of this process.
The mechanics are well worth your time, but the overriding truth is that Democrats have been trying to steal elections for years. Thanks to investigative reporting teams like The American Thinker, Americans are finally beginning to wake up to the ugly truth.
