The Discerning Texan

All that is necessary for evil to triumph, is for good men to do nothing.
-- Edmund Burke
Tuesday, June 26, 2007

UPDATED Shamnesty vote today; things are not looking good

Michelle is covering the entire debate blow by blow. The all-important cloture vote is today. Michelle also has all the local numbers of those still on the fence. Norm Coleman of Minnesota appears to have buckled. Let's un-buckle him while there is still time. Use the alternate phone numbers Michelle provides; the Washington switchboards are reportedly shut down. Guess they don't really want to hear what you have to say... but the in-state numbers are still working so call there.

You are being betrayed today, my friends. Stabbed in the back. Don't take it lying down.

UPDATE: Jim DeMint (Patriot-SC), speaking yesterday afternoon:
"We do still have a shot to stop it, but it's only going to be if the American people raise the level of their voices in the next 24 hours"
Have you called one of the dangling Senators yet? What are you waiting for?

UPDATE: More discouraging news from Hot Air, which post includes a quote from Stanley Kurtz at The Corner--here is Kurtz's take:

Something about this immigration battle doesn’t sit well. For all the bitterness of our political battles, there’s at least the sense that the government responds to the drift of public opinion. The Republicans in Congress turned into big spenders and the war in Iraq went poorly. As a result the Democrats prospered in 2006, if narrowly. That’s how democracy works. Our politics are often angry and ugly (and that’s a problem), but this is because the public is deeply divided on issues of great importance. Deep down, we understand that our political problems reflect our own divisions.

Somehow this immigration battle feels different. The bill is wildly unpopular, yet it’s close to passing. The contrast with the high-school textbook version of democracy is not only glaring and maddening, it’s downright embarrassing. Usually, even when we’re at each others’ throats, there’s still an underlying pride in the democratic process. This immigration battle strips us of even that pride.

I’m still stuck on the way this bill was going to be pushed through without a public airing of crucial provisions, in the two or three days before Memorial Day recess. But I should be stuck even further back–on the way this bill was cooked up in a backroom deal that bypassed the ordinary process of public hearings. We take them for granted, but those civics textbook fundamentals are there for a reason. We’re going to pay a steep price for setting the fundamentals aside.

Senators who believe that by passing this bill they will at least be getting a divisive issue out of the way are making a serious mistake. This is not 1986. The immigration issue is far more prominent now, and it will only grow in importance. Demographics, and the problems of assimilation in a globalized world of satellite dishes and easy travel will see to that. Look at how votes on the war have come back to haunt Democratic politicians. Votes by legislators of both parties on this bill will be haunting them–and all of us–for years to come.

Supporters of this bill sell it as a compromise that will heal America’s divisions. I fear it’s quite the reverse. This bill is infuriating the public and undermining faith in government itself. You can see it in the polling on confidence in Congress and the President. If this bill passes, it’s going to aggravate and embitter politics for years to come. Passing a measure over such overwhelming opposition is like slapping the public in the face.

You can’t solve an argument by imposing a "compromise" on parties who don’t actually view it as a compromise. You can’t heal social divisions by forcing your version of a "solution" down the public’s throats. Real healing comes only when two sides reach what they themselves consider a valid compromise, or when one side wins the argument by persuading a clear majority of the validity of its case. Democracy does work, but first the Senate has got to give it a try.

Nice sentiments, but it appears we are a long way away from ownership of our own government the way it was taught in civics class. This whole back-room deal in the shadows is a disgrace.

Unfortunately, the only way we have to show our disgust is with our letters and calls, our votes, and our pocketbooks. And it isn't only the sitting Senators who are the problem; we need to take control back from the RNC too, because we simply cannot afford not to force the national party to put up viable alternatives when these clowns come up for re-election. Yes the game is to win, and yes I am a "party man" as Mr. Disreali so eloquently put it; but I have reached my fill point with the NRSC: if we keep putting RINO's like Arlen Specter, John McCain, and Lindsey Graham in office, these betrayals will never stop. And we will never have our country back...

It may be that the only way to accomplish this change of attitude--this wake up call that it is OUR country, not theirs--would be to withdraw support for incumbent backstabbers and to hold our nose with a Democrat for six years while waiting for an alternative to the RINO's to surface. But that is a horrible--even potentially catastrophic--solution to the problem; instead we must demand viable alternatives in the Primaries, and we need to let the people of the States--rather than the national party or the President--choose who goes up against the Dems in the fall. We not only need to take our Senate back; we need to take our party back.

If this atrocity of a bill goes through, my advice would be to contact both your national and state Republican party (especially the NRSC), and tell them they are not going to see another DIME of your money--that you henceforth will only support candidates who recognize that they are the servants--not the masters--of the people who put them there. If they can't do that, then we don't want them in office, period.

Labels: , ,

DiscerningTexan, 6/26/2007 11:16:00 AM |