The Discerning Texan

All that is necessary for evil to triumph, is for good men to do nothing.
-- Edmund Burke
Wednesday, September 12, 2007

Who is Hillary giving all that money back TO???

No one knows where Norman Hsu got his cash--so when the press fell all over itself to talk about how "smart" Hillary was to give some $850,000 dollars of the tainted money she received from Hsu's 'bundeled' donors "back..."--you would think that some journalist out there would ask the obvious question: Back to who, exactly? The Red Chinese? George Soros? That postman in California who only made $49K per year, yet gave over $200K to Dems over two years? And where did Mr. Paw get all his cash?

The MSM seems perfectly content to just let this "do over" slide right off of the Teflon family's slimy skin, but you would think that someone would think far enough past their own hand to wonder what in the hell "giving it back" might mean....

Meanwhile Flip Pidot has been doing some more homework; do you remember for how many months the Jack Abramoff scandal was kept in the news by the MSM? It seemed more like years, not months.

Well, by the time this scandal is all said and done, our Mr. Hsu may dwarf anything Abramoff did:

Hillary Clinton announced today that instead of the $23,000 in direct Norman Hsu contributions she'd agreed to give up, she'll be refunding an astounding $850,000, representing not only Hsu's donations, but the "bundled" fundraising he ostensibly raised from a group of friends and associates, who have come under scrutiny as possible conduits through which Hsu may have funneled additional contributions in order to circumvent campaign finance laws.

In my most recently posted compilation, I'd found roughly $174,000 in Hsu-connected funds. I've been continuing to trudge through the disclosures in the days since, but to date, I've only come up with a total of $217,200, meaning there's still more than $600,000 in the Clinton coffers yet to be independently connected to Hsu's network.

With nearly 75% of Hillary's total acknowledged haul from Hsu's network coming from sources not known to be Hsu associates (an estimated 260 donors in all), it seems incumbent on Clinton to reveal this list of tainted contributors such that we can more accurately determine the full extent of other candidates' Hsu-related contributions.

The new Hsu fundraising I've compiled over the last few days have lifted my grand total from $1.59 million (as most recently posted) to $1.85 million. Including the hidden bonanza Hillary's just revealed (and excluding the maximum possible overlap), the total shoots up to $2.44 million.

Hsu_abramoff

Hsu_abramoff_table $2.44 million therefore being the new low estimate, that's the figure I've used to update the Hsu-Abramoff horse race. To give you an idea of how important it is that Hillary divulge her list of 260 tainted donors, however, if the rest of Hsu's beneficiaries have as much well-hidden Hsu money relative to what's already been found, the grand total would rise to $6.98 million, nearly doubling all of Abramoff's and his clients' problematic lobbying expenditures, to both Republicans and Democrats.

Somebody get out there and follow those refunds! And if I were in the Justice Department, I might want to have a peek at those campaign books.

UPDATE: Fellow Texan Law Blogger Beldar has some interesting news: Hillary and Sandy "keep it in your pants" Berger are teaming up again! It's the least she can do for the man who stole all that incriminating evidence out of the National Archives...

Labels: , , , ,

DiscerningTexan, 9/12/2007 09:23:00 PM |