The Discerning Texan

All that is necessary for evil to triumph, is for good men to do nothing.
-- Edmund Burke
Wednesday, June 27, 2007

Will Republicans turn against Talk Radio and the Internet too?

I think Glenn Reynolds may be on to something here; and I don't like it one bit. I always had thought Orwell was worst-case-scenario science fiction. But obviously--because he was so close to the Communists before his seeing them in action in the Spanish Civil War changed his entire outlook--Orwell was well aware what the ideological thought police are capable of. A pity that the American people seem to be sleeping through the demise of everything their country was supposed to stand for:
PREDICTION: Right now it's Democrats pushing a return to the "Fairness Doctrine," but they'll soon be joined by Republicans tired of things like this, and there will be pressure to extend regulation to the Internet. Incumbistan will unite under threat from outside.

Labels: , , , , ,

DiscerningTexan, 6/27/2007 03:28:00 PM | Permalink | |
Sunday, June 24, 2007

"Marriage" and "Natural Family" is now "Hate Speech" in Oakland

From the capital of moonbattery--the SF Bay Area--we now have a full on assault on common-sense morality (via Captain Ed and George Will):

Oakland has banned a group of African-American Christian women from accessing a government e-mail and message board system because it considers them bigoted and interested in conducting hate speech. While the same systems regularly carry political statements from gay-rights groups, the city has banned the women because of the loaded language in their communications -- words such as marriage and natural family. George Will explains:

Marriage is the foundation of the natural family and sustains family values. That sentence is inflammatory, perhaps even a hate crime.

At least it is in Oakland, Calif. That city's government says those words, italicized here, constitute something akin to hate speech and can be proscribed from the government's open e-mail system and employee bulletin board. ...

Some African American Christian women working for Oakland's government organized the Good News Employee Association (GNEA), which they announced with a flier describing their group as "a forum for people of Faith to express their views on the contemporary issues of the day. With respect for the Natural Family, Marriage and Family Values."

The flier was distributed after other employees' groups, including those advocating gay rights, had advertised their political views and activities on the city's e-mail system and bulletin board. When the GNEA asked for equal opportunity to communicate by that system and that board, it was denied. Furthermore, the flier they posted was taken down and destroyed by city officials, who declared it "homophobic" and disruptive.

The city government said the flier was "determined" to promote harassment based on sexual orientation. The city warned that the flier and communications like it could result in disciplinary action "up to and including termination."

Labels: , , , ,

DiscerningTexan, 6/24/2007 04:12:00 PM | Permalink | |
Thursday, June 21, 2007

UPDATED: If You Can't Compete, Cheat; Stalinist Dems seek to silence Remaining Media Oppostion

The campaign against the very popular medium of talk radio has officially begun. Talk radio is about the only media left where conservatives can go to find like-minded viewpoints, as the elite left has virtually overwhelmed TV news, Newspapers, and universities with ideologues in lock step with its collectivist agenda. Radio, unlike the other have has media, taken a free-market approach: with conservative hosts, their advertising revenue is much higher--so more and more stations are picking up conservative shows. Air America was an attempt by the left to get into this game, but its ratings were so low it went bankrupt. So now there is only one way for the left to silence its critics: if they can't succeed on radio, they want NO one to succeed there.

Operating under the auspices of the Soros-funded Center for American Progress, the Left is now making a full frontal assault on talk radio via the so-called "Fairness Doctrine". The "Fairness Doctrine" would have the same impact on American radio as Hugo Chavez silencing that TV network in Argentina. It is hard to know, but if the people of Venezuela can take to the streets after its dictator silences their voice, it is not to far out to think that conservatives might have a similar reaction if they pull the plug on Limbaugh, Hannity, Ingraham, Miller, Hewitt, Prager, Boortz, etc., etc.

UPDATE: La Shawn Barber has an excellent name for this syndrome: "Airwave entry". And Blake Dvorak writes:

In other words "progressive" talk radio hasn't been able to compete, so now they want the government to step in with a whole assortment of regulations. No amount of Orwellian language can change the fact that this is censorship.

The report would be easy to dismiss if not for the fact that Speaker Nancy Pelosi has said she will "aggressively pursue" reinstatement of the Fairness Doctrine, according to two House Democrats who spoke to the American Spectator last month.

A senior adviser to Pelosi explained the Speaker's reasons to the Specator:

First, [Democrats] failed on the radio airwaves with Air America, no one wanted to listen ... Conservative radio is a huge threat and political advantage for Republicans and we have had to find a way to limit it. Second, it looks like the Republicans are going to have someone in the presidential race who has access to media in ways our folks don't want, so we want to make sure the GOP has no advantages going into 2008.

Despite these quotes, as well as the popularity of muzzling conservative talk-radio among the liberal base, it would be extremely unwise for Pelosi to pursue this: 1.) The Democrats would take a severe beating politically not just from Republicans, but from a public that, whatever its opinion of Limbaugh and his peers, isn't about to condone their silencing by the government for what Republicans could easily cast as a political witch-hunt; 2.) Pelosi probably wouldn't want to waste precious political capital pushing something that will generate enormous coverage only for it to get vetoed anyway; and 3.) Pelosi has no interest in uniting a conservative base fractured over immigration, especially going into an election year.

This attempt to bury opposition voices is not American, and it must be strongly resisted.

Labels: , ,

DiscerningTexan, 6/21/2007 07:08:00 PM | Permalink | |