The Discerning Texan
-- Edmund Burke
Friday, June 29, 2007
Another Big Win at the Supreme Court -- and Thomas Shines
In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that achieving "diversity" is too weak an argument to justify shuffling kids around on the basis of skin color. Though Chief Justice John Roberts's opinion is couched in language of precedent and respect for existing law, this case is a clean win for individualists -- i.e., for those who oppose racial preferences or racial handicaps. Things might have gone very differently if Justice Sandra Day (prepare for 25 more years of affirmative action) O'Connor were still on the court.Justice Breyer wrote the dissent and was joined by Justices Souter, Ginsberg and Stevens. Roberts answered the dissent in the majority opinion (a rare thing in Supreme Court opinions) and basically demolished Breyer's arguments. But Justice Thomas's separate concurrence was a tour de force.
Labels: Education, Racial Politics, Supreme Court
Saturday, May 12, 2007
Double Standard
Cartoon by Chuck Asay (click to enlarge)
Labels: Islamic Fascism, PC, Racial Politics, The Left, Thought Police
Wednesday, May 09, 2007
Q: How do you know if Al Sharpton is lying? A: He opens his mouth.
Labels: Al Sharpton, Civil Rights Extortionists, Racial Politics
Sunday, April 15, 2007
Obama's Lame Imus Response
Since we are all responsible, none of us are. If, I say *IF* Sen. Obama wants to lead on this issue, he could start by pointing a finger at some real targets. Some hard targets; waiting five days and then denouncing Imus does not merit a Profile in Courage.
Just to help him get started, I wonder whether his new friend David Geffen has any clout in the record industry; I further wonder whether Sen. Obama wants to exhort him to help clean up Hollywood.
Labels: Barack Obama, PC, Racial Politics, Thought Police
Friday, April 13, 2007
PC Racism: Sharpton and his Mistress CBS/Viacom
It is very telling that CBS (which fired Imus yesterday) and Viacom (which owns Comedy Central) have the SAME Chairman/CEO. Why is this relevant? Because you see more racial insults per capita on Comedy Central than almost any other broadcast network out there (exception: Al Sharpton himself; why is HIS show still allowed to air?). And hey, I even watch Comedy Central sometimes. Even Southpark. I am not saying it should be censored; I am saying the pathetic, bigoted Imus should not have been. We are smart enough to tell who is racist and who is not. Imus? Check. Sharpton? Check. Jesse Jackson? Check. So why can Imus and not the other two? You and I both know that answer.
"All the pigs are created equal, but some are more equal than others."
-- Napoleon, as stated in Orwell's Animal Farm
And, while it is hard for me to comment too much on African-American culture in general--because I am not black and have not walked that walk--here is one African-America of integrity that does have something to say about it. So I will let him do the talking.
Ultimately I believe this is going to be used as a stepping-stone towards censorship of center-right talk radio. That is why we must continue to dwell on this hypocrisy. Is Imus a racist? I don't know, he certainly appears to be; but there are many more racists out there on the airwaves. What we are talking about here is "PC Racism". And that dog just won't hunt.
Labels: American Culture, Racial Politics, Travesty of Justice
Thursday, April 12, 2007
In the end, preferential treatment trumps Imus in battle for Airwaves
I am not condoning what Imus said. But I am pointing out there is a double standard at play. Imus has been sliming people, races, and religions for years. Perhaps it is just the thin skin of certain African-American paid extortion artists--but I doubt it. And I won't even get into to the rappers and what they do: on networks like CBS, Comedy Central, HBO, etc... No, one gets the feeling that this isn't really about "decorum". This is something else...
My guess is they will use this to try and promote regulation of what can and cannot be said on the airwaves. First Amendment? What's that? And it is only a small step from there to "equal time". There is a reason why they are raising such a stink about this. Imus is just a pawn in the way.
Rick Moran has more to say about this.
UPDATE: It is heartening to see that a guy like Neil Boortz agrees with my theory.
Labels: PC, Racial Politics, Thought Police
Saturday, March 31, 2007
Gasp! Obama's Ancestors Owned Slaves?
ISP Subscription? $39.95
Mouse click? free
Living in an Orwellian nightmare but then stumbling across this story? priceless.
Labels: Barack Obama, Democrat, Racial Politics
Race Baiters claim "offense" at Rove Rap
I'm sorry, but has anyone out there ever seen Dave Chappelle's (hilarious...) imitation of "white dudes"? Perhaps it is just me, but I wasn't offended by this obvious and blatant racial "slur" against Anglo-Saxon Americans; actually I thought it was genius...
But even if I or somebody else had been offended--so what?? Since when does the Constitution protect us from being offended? If that were the case, no one in Congress, the White House, or the Supreme Court would have jobs. In fact neither would that Politico reporter.
I would just like someone to clue me in as to why the hell is it a "news story" that some member of a "protected class" of victims got offended by Rove?
I am offended by Nancy Pelosi every single day: quick, alert the media!
Labels: Racial Politics, US Politics


































