The Discerning Texan

All that is necessary for evil to triumph, is for good men to do nothing.
-- Edmund Burke
Tuesday, May 29, 2007

Betrayal and Shame


Cartoon by Cox and Forkum (click to enlarge)

Labels: , , , , , ,

DiscerningTexan, 5/29/2007 09:45:00 PM | Permalink | |
Sunday, May 06, 2007

State Department Derangement Syndrome

Let's see: they want to eradicate the Jews, murder as many Americans as possible, take over Iraq, obtain nuclear weapons and blackmail their neighbors with them, monopolize the price of oil, stone women to death while making them second class citizens, and continue to fund Global Jihad--and then wait for the 12th Imam to come take the lot of them to heaven so they can cavort with virgins. Wow; it sounds like we have all kinds of common ground here --why don't we negotiate with Iran?

Pure Insanity.

Labels: ,

DiscerningTexan, 5/06/2007 10:24:00 PM | Permalink | |
Thursday, April 26, 2007

It's Official: Condi Rice has gone to the Dark Side UPDATED

The State Department is sort of like the AIDS virus: you often don't know it has infected you until it is too late. And by then, it has rendered you completely spineless.

Condi Rice started out the Bush Administration as a tough-as-nails National Security Advisor who knew the difference between our friends and our enemies. Then came the highly-touted "deal" with North Korea; one which has already fallen apart. But if that wasn't enough, now she appears to have completely gone over the edge; if you listen to what Michael Ledeen has to say, Condi is now wanting to cut another "deal" with Iran. Fool me once, shame on me?

This is a tough quandary for President Bush--he has always shown extreme loyalty to those who have remained loyal to him (witness Gonzales...), and Rice has been nothing if not loyal. But obviously her stance of not negotiating with the #1 State-sponsor of Islamist terror on Planet Earth--a group that has shown since repeatedly since 1979 that it cannot be trusted to act within international norms--has now been compromised. President Bush cannot dump Rice, but she needs to be marginalized now a la Colin Powell. The ghost of Madeline Albright continues to haunt the State Department.

UPDATE: Meanwhile an Iranian traitor tells all about just what the Iranians have been up to--and it is eye-opening to say the least.

Labels: , ,

DiscerningTexan, 4/26/2007 09:04:00 PM | Permalink | |
Saturday, April 14, 2007

Money for Nothing and Their Nukes for Free

Even MTV is a better alternative to the North Korean nuclear problem than the pathetic Appeasement of the State Department appears to be; at least MTV would likely drive Kim Jong Il nuts over time.

Labels: , ,

DiscerningTexan, 4/14/2007 09:40:00 PM | Permalink | |
Sunday, March 11, 2007

Steyn/Krauthammer on the Criminalization of Politics UPDATED

It is a big day in the DT household--NCAA Selection Sunday--and the first Slam Dunk of the day is Mark Steyn's take on the Libby trial. Do not miss the opportunity to read this column; it is a reverse-360, 1-handed monster jam that resonates with me like a rattling backboard. Here is a portion of Steyn's brutally honest assessment:

When a prosecutor speaks about ''a cloud over the vice president's office'' and ''a cloud over the White House,'' he is speaking politically. There is no law about the amount of cumulus permitted over 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. The prosecutor is speculating on political capital -- reputation, credibility, the currency of politics. Once damaged, they're hard to recover. So, even if it's not within the purview of the jury, his question is relevant to the wider world: How did this cloud get there and stay there even though it had no meaningful rainfall?

Answer: Patrick Fitzgerald.

The prosecutor knew from the beginning that (a) leaking Valerie Plame's name was not a crime and (b) the guy who did it was Richard Armitage. In other words, he was aware that the public and media perception of this ''case'' was entirely wrong: There was no conspiracy by Bush ideologues to damage a whistleblower, only an anti-war official making an offhand remark to an anti-war reporter. Even the usual appeals to prosecutorial discretion (Libby was a peripheral figure with only he said/she said evidence in an investigation with no underlying crime) don't convey the scale of Fitzgerald's perversity: He knew, in fact, that there was no cloud, that under all the dark scudding about Rove and Cheney there was only sunny Richard Armitage blabbing away accidentally. Yet he chose to let the entirely false impression of his ''case'' sit out there month in, month out, year after year, glowering over the White House, doing great damage to the presidency on the critical issue of the day.

So much of the current degraded discourse on the war -- ''Bush lied'' -- comes from the false perceptions of the Joe Wilson Niger story. Britain's MI-6, the French, the Italians and most other functioning intelligence services believe Saddam was trying to procure uranium from Africa. Lord Butler's special investigation supports it. So does the Senate Intelligence Committee. So Wilson's original charge is if not false then at the very least unproven, and the conspiracy arising therefrom entirely nonexistent. But the damage inflicted by the cloud is real and lasting.

As for Scooter Libby, he faces up to 25 years in jail for the crime of failing to remember when he first heard the name of Valerie Plame -- whether by accident or intent no one can ever say for sure. But we also know that Joe Wilson failed to remember that his original briefing to the CIA after getting back from Niger was significantly different from the way he characterized it in his op-ed in the New York Times. We do know that the contemptible Armitage failed to come forward and clear the air as his colleagues were smeared for months on end. We do know that his boss Colin Powell sat by as the very character of the administration was corroded.

And we know that Patrick Fitzgerald knew all this and more as he frittered away the years, and the ''political blood lust'' (as National Review's Rich Lowry calls it) grew ever more disconnected from humdrum reality. The cloud over the White House is Fitzgerald's, and his closing remarks to the jury were highly revealing. If he dislikes Bush and Cheney and the Iraq war, whoopee: Run against them, or donate to the Democrats, or get a talk-radio show. Instead, he chose in full knowledge of the truth to maintain artificially a three-year cloud over the White House while the anti-Bush left frantically mistook its salivating for the first drops of a downpour. The result is the disgrace of Scooter Libby. Big deal. Patrick Fitzgerald's disgrace is the greater, and a huge victory not for justice or the law but for the criminalization of politics.


UPDATE: Charles Krauthammer's take was pretty on target as well, and punctuates well Steyn's assessment:
There are lies and there are memory lapses. Bill Clinton denied under oath having sex with Monica Lewinsky. Unless you're Wilt Chamberlain, sex is not the kind of thing that you forget easily. Sandy Berger denied stuffing classified documents in his pants, an act not quite as elaborate as sex, but still involving a lot of muscle memory, and unlikely to have been honestly forgotten.Scooter Libby has just been convicted for four felonies that could theoretically give him 25 years in jail for ... what? Misstating when he first heard a certain piece of information, namely the identity of Joe Wilson's wife.

Think about that. Can you remember when was the first time you heard the name Joe Wilson or Valerie Plame? O.K., so it is not a preoccupation of yours. But it was a preoccupation of many Washington journalists and government officials called to testify at the Libby trial, and their memories were all over the lot. Former presidential press secretary Ari Fleischer testified under oath that he had not told Washington Post reporter Walter Pincus about Mrs. Wilson. Pincus testified under oath that Fleischer definitely had.

Obviously, one is not telling the truth. But there is no reason to believe that either one is deliberately lying. Pincus and Fleischer are as fallible as any of us. They spend their days receiving and giving information. They can't possibly be expected to remember not only every piece, but precisely when they received every piece.
Should Scooter Libby? He was famously multitasking a large number of national-security and domestic issues, receiving hundreds of pieces of information every day from dozens of sources. Yet special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald chose to make Libby's misstatements about the timing of the receipt of one piece of information — Mrs. Wilson's identity — the great white whale of his multimillion-dollar prosecutorial juggernaut.

Labels: , , , , ,

DiscerningTexan, 3/11/2007 11:39:00 AM | Permalink | |
Friday, March 02, 2007

Snakebit? Or Losing It?


Cartoon by Glenn McCoy (click to enlarge)

Labels: , , ,

DiscerningTexan, 3/02/2007 10:23:00 PM | Permalink | |

Talking with Iran? Why???

I do not know when I have been more angry at this President that I gladly voted for--twice. To enter in negotiations with--and more importantly, by doing so to legitimize a rogue regime which has been responsible for the deaths of hundreds if not thousands of Americans, who have been plotting to undermine the West since 1979, who have called for the destruction of Israel and the US, and who are acquiring nuclear weapons capable of doing just that; in clear defiance of the entire the interntaional community--is the very height of irresponsibility and a dangerous flirtation with permanent damage to this War against Islamist fascism.

Michael Ledeen weighs in, and he is not pleased either; why would he be? Anyone who read Amir Taheri's article back in November ought to know better.

Labels: , , , ,

DiscerningTexan, 3/02/2007 07:51:00 PM | Permalink | |
Monday, January 22, 2007

Hiding the Truth as Standard Operating Procedure

I've been talking for more than two years now about the CIA and State Department's secret war against the President of the United States. Well now it turns out it was not only this President that was misled by two-faced bureaucrats supposed to be working for him (via Michael Ledeen):

Bob Baer , a longtime CIA case officer in the Middle East, had a similar experience. He had lost close friends in the bombing of the American Embassy in Beirut in the early eighties, and every time he tried to find out who had killed them, he ran into a stone wall. He was constantly told that we just did not know. But he persisted, just as Scott Johnson did, and he too arrived at the truth: the bombing of the Embassy had been an act of war by the Iranian regime, using Palestinian terrorists to carry out the actual suicide mission. He too found that “we” had known about it all along, but the truth had been suppressed for two decades.

Why? Because those who controlled the information didn’t want the top policy maker—Ronald Reagan—to know it, since they “knew” he would not let it pass, and they didn’t want trouble with Iran.

I, too, had a similar experience. I helped organize meetings in Rome in December, 2001, with Pentagon Iran experts and knowledgeable Iranians. They provided information about Iranian killers in Afghanistan, whose mission was to kill American soldiers. The information was accurate, and the would-be killers did not accomplish their mission (I hope they were killed, but I am not privy to that information). Shortly thereafter, Secretary of State Powell and his deputy, Richard Armitage, with the agreement of Director of Central Intelligence Tenet, demanded that all such contacts be terminated. Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld gave orders that no Pentagon employee speak to “Iranians” (which prompted one Iranian-American official to ask if conversations with parents were included in the order).

Why? Because they did not want trouble with Iran, and they “knew” that if President Bush had that information, he would not let it pass.

We have now had further examples of this sort of lie. We now know that top American officials have known all along that Iran has been waging war on us in Iraq, but this information has been suppressed.

Why? Because they, too did not want trouble with Iran. Military leaders did not want a two-front war (even though it should have been obvious, even before the onset of Operation Iraqi Freedom, that we were engaged in a regional war, whatever our wishes were), and the spooks and diplomats convinced themselves that we could cut a deal with the mullahs.

Lots of lying, as you see, but the biggest lie of all is the lie the liars told themselves: the monstrous lie that we can arrive at peace with our enemies without first defeating them.

I am told that we have discovered truly explosive information about the Iranian role in Iraq in the recent raids in Baghdad and Irbil, the raids that led to the arrest of high officers in the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps. I believe we are all entitled to that information. To be sure, some of it may be “actionable intelligence,” which must be kept secret—even from the New York Times—until we have acted on it. But the American people are entitled to know the big picture, which is the one some of us have been painting for many years: Iran is waging war on us, killing our soldiers, slaughtering Iraqis, enabling Hizbollah in Lebanon, empowering Hamas and Islamic Jihad in their war against Israel.

The American people cannot properly judge our performance in this war unless they know its true dimensions. The president must provide us with that basic truth.

Labels: , , , , ,

DiscerningTexan, 1/22/2007 10:08:00 PM | Permalink | |
Friday, January 19, 2007

State Department/CIA fight Pentagon over detention of Iranian Terror Suspects

As usual, our State Department and the rogue CIA are trying to sabotage our war effort. State and CIA have been in open warfare against the President almost since the beginning of his administration; last week we hear they are stonewalling the FBI's leak investigations; now this week we find they are resisting the President's interdiction of Iranians who are personally responsible for the killing of American soldiers: does anyone but me see a pattern here?

Labels: , , , , ,

DiscerningTexan, 1/19/2007 08:39:00 PM | Permalink | |