The Discerning Texan
-- Edmund Burke
Tuesday, July 10, 2007
The Gall...

Cartoon by Chip Bok (click to enlarge)
Labels: 2008 Presidential Race, Bill Clinton, Cartoons, Hillary, Libby, Pardons
Monday, July 02, 2007
UPDATED: Bush Commutes Libby's Sentence
I haven't been exactly wild about the President's stance on the "all or nothing" Immigration Bill, I feel he has been way to conciliatory towards the Democrats in general, and Condi Rice has gone over to the Dark Side; with that said, when the President gets something right, he deserves recognition. Obviously he will take some flak from the Left for this. But everyone knows this was a "show trial" and that Libby should never have even gotten to the point where his testimony was needed--after all the egomanical Fitzgerald already knew who the leaker was before Libby ever was interviewed by the Grand Jury. This was a pure fishing expedidtion, by a prosecutor who could not bear for all that time and money to have been viewed the total waste that it was.
Stay tuned. Official announcement supposedly to come soon.
Well done, Mr. President.
UPDATE: The al-Associated Press has the story now.
UPDATE: Fred Thompson is quick to support the move. And Kathryn Jean Lopez feels a bit better about the Prez, too.
Labels: CIA Sabotage, Intelligence War against Bush Admin, Libby, Media Bias, Patrick Fitzgerald, Plame, Travesty of Justice
Thursday, June 21, 2007
Libby Appeal: Looking Good from a Legal Standpoint
Labels: Libby, Patrick Fitzgerald, Travesty of Justice
Tuesday, June 19, 2007
When it comes to Libby (and Fitzgerald), even some Libs get it
The attorney general called a meeting. He assembled all the U.S. attorneys in the Great Hall of the Justice Department and told them, in essence, that their chief responsibility was to decide whom not to prosecute. They should limit themselves to cases "in which the offense is the most flagrant, the public harm the greatest" and play no role in political vendettas. The speaker, of course, was not the lamentable Alberto Gonzales but the estimable Robert H. Jackson, who went on to the Supreme Court. This was 1940, but Jackson could have been talking to Patrick J. Fitzgerald. Whatever the case, the special counsel was not listening.
With the sentencing of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Fitzgerald has apparently finished his work, which was, not to put too fine a point on it, to make a mountain out of a molehill. At the urging of the liberal press (especially the New York Times), he was appointed to look into a run-of-the-mill leak and wound up prosecuting not the leaker -- Richard Armitage of the State Department -- but Libby, convicted in the end of lying. This is not an entirely trivial matter since government officials should not lie to grand juries, but neither should they be called to account for practicing the dark art of politics. As with sex or real estate, it is often best to keep the lights off.The upshot was a train wreck -- mile after mile of shame, infamy, embarrassment and occasional farce, all of it described in the forthcoming "Off the Record," a vigorously written account of what went wrong, by Norman Pearlstine, Time Inc.'s former editor in chief.
[...] the rest of us ought to consider what Fitzgerald has wrought and whether we are better off for his efforts. I have come to hate the war and I cannot approve of lying under oath -- not by Scooter, not by Bill Clinton, not by anybody. But the underlying crime is absent, the sentence is excessive and the investigation should not have been conducted in the first place. This is a mess. Should Libby be pardoned? Maybe. Should his sentence be commuted? Definitely.
Let us hope that the President is listening.
Labels: Libby, Patrick Fitzgerald, President Bush, Travesty of Justice
Monday, June 18, 2007
Good News for Libby?
Doing the right thing plays well with the base. The President and his handlers should keep that in mind as they watch this Immigration debate play out.
Labels: Libby, President Bush
Friday, June 15, 2007
Small Victories: Nifong Resigns
- the Fourth Circuit Court (minus two Justices which replacements the Democrat Senate refuses to confirm..) voted 2-1 to confer Constitutional rights on a foreign-born, non-citizen who was a high-ranking member of Al Qaeda, a group we are at War with, and who was caught here in a sleeper cell awaiting Al Qaeda's orders to commit mass murder;
- the Immigration Bill has reared its ugly head again and once again threatens to destroy the Republican Party;
- the Democrat Majority leader of the US Senate publically labeled highly-decorated Generals--including the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs--who are trying to motivate and lead American troops into battle in that War -- as "incompetent" ; and,
- a dedicated and highly-respected public servant who absolutely did nothing wrong was ordered to prison, at the end of a political witch hunt orchestrated by the CIA and other enemies of the President--all to score political points against a lame-duck Administration.
In a week where all of this terrible news came down, at least the scumbag Prosecutor who tried to ruin the lives of innocent College kids won't be hurting anyone else for a while. Durham DA Mike Nifong resigned today.
Of course this can hardly be compared to the damage that this zealous prosecutor trying to win the black vote did to those kids, to a prestigious University, and to an entire community--but at least it's a start.
Labels: Al Qaeda, Duke Rape Case, Harry Reid, Illegal Immigration, Libby, Nifong, Republican, Travesty of Justice
Thursday, June 14, 2007
UPDATED Libby Ordered Jailed
UPDATE: Tom McGuire says to expect jail to happen soon... unless the President intervenes
Labels: CIA Sabotage, Intelligence War against Bush Admin, Libby, Media Bias, Plame, Travesty of Justice
Thursday, June 07, 2007
Theory: Walton is HOPING Bush will Pardon Libby to avoid the humiliation of Overturn
Of particular interest to me are the particulars of the Appeal Petition--particularly Judge Walton's refusal to admit Andrea Mitchell's testimony--and what the ramifications may entail for this Federal Judge who clearly overstepped his bounds multiple times here. This is an interesting play for President Bush--who owes it to Libby to keep him from doing hard time--but who could also be completely vindicated (along with Libby) should Walton's sloppy handling of the case lead to the decision being overturned. Stay tuned.
Labels: CIA Sabotage, Intelligence War against Bush Admin, Libby, Media Bias, Plame, Travesty of Justice
Wednesday, June 06, 2007
House Republicnas want Probe of CIA/ABC Leak
And while you are at it, Mr. President, how about pardoning Scooter Libby, whose only crime was defending the Administration's legitimate policy in Iraq.
Labels: CIA Sabotage, Intelligence War against Bush Admin, Libby, Media Bias, Media War
Tuesday, June 05, 2007
Two Words: Pardon Libby
We said it in March, when I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby became the only person convicted of any crime in the CIA-leak investigation, and we’ll say it again now that he has been sentenced to two and a half years in prison: President Bush should pardon Libby, and do it now.
There has always been solid justification for a pardon. Although he tried mightily, prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald never found enough evidence to charge Libby or anyone else with violating the Intelligence Identities Protection Act or the Espionage Act in the CIA-leak affair. From the beginning of his investigation, Fitzgerald knew who revealed CIA employee Valerie Plame’s identity to columnist Robert Novak, and it wasn’t Libby. (That honor goes to former deputy secretary of State Richard Armitage.) The fact that there was a special prosecutor at all was more the result of bureaucratic infighting and political cowardice in the Bush administration than of any wrongdoing by Libby or the others who were investigated. And finally, the discrepancies between Libby’s grand-jury testimony and that of the journalists who contradicted him can be explained by differences in memory, and should not have resulted in perjury and obstruction-of-justice charges against Libby. Anyone who watched Libby’s trial knows it was a parade of conflicting memories, and reasonable people could disagree with the jury’s verdict.
Now, however, we have a new reason to call on President Bush to pardon Libby: Fitzgerald’s deplorable behavior in the days leading up to the sentencing. In pre-sentencing legal arguments, it became clear that Fitzgerald wanted the judge to sentence Libby, who had been found guilty of process crimes, as if he had instead been convicted of those more serious underlying allegations that formed the basis of the CIA-leak investigation. Fitzgerald ignored the fact that he had never brought charges under the Intelligence Identities Protection Act or the Espionage Act, and wrote that the grand jury “obtained substantial evidence indicating that one or both of the statutes may have been violated.” He asked Judge Reggie Walton to treat Libby as if it had been proven that such crimes occurred.
The problem was that Fitzgerald not only did not charge Libby or anyone else with those underlying crimes, he never even offered any evidence in court that those crimes, as carefully defined by the statutes involved, ever happened. His throw-the-book-at-him sentencing recommendation contradicted the conclusion reached by probation officials, who in their pre-sentencing report pointed out that “the defendant was neither charged nor convicted of any crime involving the leaking of [Valerie Plame Wilson’s] ‘covert’ status.”
Going one step farther, Fitzgerald also argued that Mrs. Wilson was, without any doubt, a covert CIA agent as defined by the Intelligence Identities Protection Act. In court filings, he offered what he said was a CIA-authored summary of her job status affirming that, at the time her name was revealed by Novak, she was covert, and that the CIA was taking “affirmative measures to conceal her identity,” as required by law. But many months ago, when Libby’s defense team was begging for such information, Fitzgerald refused to provide it. He pointedly declined to call Plame “covert.” He said her job status was irrelevant to the case against Libby. He even argued that it was irrelevant whether Mrs. Wilson worked at the CIA at all. Agreeing with Fitzgerald, Judge Walton barred both sides from discussing Mrs. Wilson’s status at the trial.
But in the days before sentencing, Fitzgerald suddenly wanted to talk about Mrs. Wilson’s job. Again, Libby’s lawyers were given no chance to look into her status at the CIA. “We have never been granted an opportunity to challenge this conclusory assertion or any of the other unsubstantiated claims in this document, nor permitted to investigate how it was created,” the defense team argued. “If nothing else, the fact that the CIA’s spokesperson confirmed Ms. Wilson’s CIA employment to Mr. Novak calls into question whether the government was taking affirmative measures to conceal her identity.”
All of this might be funny if it weren’t so serious for Libby. He is a dedicated public servant caught in a crazy political fight that should have never happened, convicted of lying about a crime that the prosecutor can’t even prove was committed.
President Bush has the power to end this ridiculous saga right now. He should do so.
Labels: Libby, Patrick Fitzgerald, Travesty of Justice
Tuesday, May 01, 2007
Debriefing the Libby affair
... On July 6, 2003, former U.S. Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV charged in the New York Times that the administration had manipulated intelligence findings in order to rationalize the invasion of Iraq. He knew this, Wilson wrote in a lengthy op-ed, because he himself had been sent to Africa by the CIA a year earlier to investigate a report that Niger was supplying uranium ore to Iraq. He had come across nothing to support this allegation. Yet not only had his negative finding been ignored by the administration, but the President, in his January 2003 State of the Union address, specifically invoked the supposed connection between Saddam Hussein and Niger. “Based on my experience with the administration in the months leading up to the war,” Wilson summarized, “I have little choice but to conclude that some of the intelligence related to Iraq’s nuclear-weapons program was twisted to exaggerate the Iraqi threat.”
A week after Wilson’s op-ed appeared, someone leaked to the press that the ambassador’s wife, Valerie Plame Wilson, was employed by the CIA as a covert agent, and that her husband’s trip to Niger had been little more than a “junket” conducted at her behest. Under the Intelligence Identities Protection Act (IIPA), signed into law in 1982, it is a felony knowingly to divulge the identity of a covert agent (if the information was received through official channels). The disclosure of Mrs. Wilson’s identity, jeopardizing her undercover work for the CIA and potentially compromising national security, might have constituted a violation of IIPA—this, in pursuit of a petty official vendetta against her husband for having dared challenge the Bush White House. In view of the seriousness of the possible offense, a government investigation ensued, leading in time to the trial of Scooter Libby.
The trouble with this narrative is that Libby was not the source of the information; nor was he ever charged with the crime of leaking it. This, however, has not appeared to trouble his accusers. As Joseph Wilson would put it after the trial, Libby’s conviction for perjury rather than for violating the IIPA was like putting Al Capone behind bars for tax evasion; when you are dealing with known criminals, the particular crime you catch them at is less important than catching them at all. Similarly, in the judgment of Max Frankel, the former executive editor of the New York Times (writing in the Sunday Times Magazine), the essential point to be gleaned from the trial is that Libby was indeed engaged in a White House campaign to expose Mrs. Wilson and discredit her husband; the fact that the information about her was first leaked through other channels was a matter only of happenstance, or perhaps incompetence.
But despite the wishes of those who take their history via synecdoche, this reading of the Libby trial is wrong on every point. Indeed, for a trial that is said to have been about the nature of truth-telling and lying, it is amazing how mistaken is the impression most people have both of the proceeding itself and of its meaning. This is the case not only for Libby’s enemies but also for his defenders, who tend to construe his fall as a tale of tragic personal sacrifice in the name of a higher cause—protecting his superiors and, through them, the continued prosecution of the war against terror. In fact, it is a tale of something else entirely.
Read the rest here; this is devastating to anyone who still is clinging to the notion that the Libby trial was about Intelligence secrets.
Labels: Intelligence War against Bush Admin, Libby, Patrick Fitzgerald, Plame, Travesty of Justice
Wednesday, April 04, 2007
What is Patrick Fitzgerald Hiding?
Labels: Libby, Patrick Fitzgerald, Plame, Travesty of Justice
Wednesday, March 28, 2007
Why more than one person may be taking the Fifth...
Labels: Democrat Sabotage, Justice Department, Libby
Friday, March 16, 2007
You Won't Believe THIS Load of Crap... UPDATED
... the news that Ms. Plame is so covert that not even she knows if she is legally covert is the stuff of late night comedy. This is from Mr. Apuzzo:Plame also repeatedly described herself as a covert operative, a term that has multiple meanings. Plame said she worked undercover and traveled abroad on secret missions for the CIA.
But the word "covert" also has a legal definition requiring recent foreign service and active efforts to keep someone's identity secret. Critics of Fitzgerald's investigation said Plame did not meet that definition for several reasons and said that's why nobody was charged with the leak.
...Plame said she wasn't a lawyer and didn't know what her legal status was but said it shouldn't have mattered to the officials who learned her identity.
Uh, Right...
UPDATED: Byron York has 10 nicely pointed Questions for Valerie Plame Wilson.
Labels: Intelligence War against Bush Admin, Libby, Plame
Monday, March 12, 2007
Libby and Sandy Berger: Radically Diffrerent Treatment
Labels: Libby, Sandy Berger, Travesty of Justice
Sunday, March 11, 2007
Steyn/Krauthammer on the Criminalization of Politics UPDATED
When a prosecutor speaks about ''a cloud over the vice president's office'' and ''a cloud over the White House,'' he is speaking politically. There is no law about the amount of cumulus permitted over 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. The prosecutor is speculating on political capital -- reputation, credibility, the currency of politics. Once damaged, they're hard to recover. So, even if it's not within the purview of the jury, his question is relevant to the wider world: How did this cloud get there and stay there even though it had no meaningful rainfall?
Answer: Patrick Fitzgerald.
The prosecutor knew from the beginning that (a) leaking Valerie Plame's name was not a crime and (b) the guy who did it was Richard Armitage. In other words, he was aware that the public and media perception of this ''case'' was entirely wrong: There was no conspiracy by Bush ideologues to damage a whistleblower, only an anti-war official making an offhand remark to an anti-war reporter. Even the usual appeals to prosecutorial discretion (Libby was a peripheral figure with only he said/she said evidence in an investigation with no underlying crime) don't convey the scale of Fitzgerald's perversity: He knew, in fact, that there was no cloud, that under all the dark scudding about Rove and Cheney there was only sunny Richard Armitage blabbing away accidentally. Yet he chose to let the entirely false impression of his ''case'' sit out there month in, month out, year after year, glowering over the White House, doing great damage to the presidency on the critical issue of the day.
So much of the current degraded discourse on the war -- ''Bush lied'' -- comes from the false perceptions of the Joe Wilson Niger story. Britain's MI-6, the French, the Italians and most other functioning intelligence services believe Saddam was trying to procure uranium from Africa. Lord Butler's special investigation supports it. So does the Senate Intelligence Committee. So Wilson's original charge is if not false then at the very least unproven, and the conspiracy arising therefrom entirely nonexistent. But the damage inflicted by the cloud is real and lasting.
As for Scooter Libby, he faces up to 25 years in jail for the crime of failing to remember when he first heard the name of Valerie Plame -- whether by accident or intent no one can ever say for sure. But we also know that Joe Wilson failed to remember that his original briefing to the CIA after getting back from Niger was significantly different from the way he characterized it in his op-ed in the New York Times. We do know that the contemptible Armitage failed to come forward and clear the air as his colleagues were smeared for months on end. We do know that his boss Colin Powell sat by as the very character of the administration was corroded.
And we know that Patrick Fitzgerald knew all this and more as he frittered away the years, and the ''political blood lust'' (as National Review's Rich Lowry calls it) grew ever more disconnected from humdrum reality. The cloud over the White House is Fitzgerald's, and his closing remarks to the jury were highly revealing. If he dislikes Bush and Cheney and the Iraq war, whoopee: Run against them, or donate to the Democrats, or get a talk-radio show. Instead, he chose in full knowledge of the truth to maintain artificially a three-year cloud over the White House while the anti-Bush left frantically mistook its salivating for the first drops of a downpour. The result is the disgrace of Scooter Libby. Big deal. Patrick Fitzgerald's disgrace is the greater, and a huge victory not for justice or the law but for the criminalization of politics.
UPDATE: Charles Krauthammer's take was pretty on target as well, and punctuates well Steyn's assessment:
There are lies and there are memory lapses. Bill Clinton denied under oath having sex with Monica Lewinsky. Unless you're Wilt Chamberlain, sex is not the kind of thing that you forget easily. Sandy Berger denied stuffing classified documents in his pants, an act not quite as elaborate as sex, but still involving a lot of muscle memory, and unlikely to have been honestly forgotten.Scooter Libby has just been convicted for four felonies that could theoretically give him 25 years in jail for ... what? Misstating when he first heard a certain piece of information, namely the identity of Joe Wilson's wife.
Think about that. Can you remember when was the first time you heard the name Joe Wilson or Valerie Plame? O.K., so it is not a preoccupation of yours. But it was a preoccupation of many Washington journalists and government officials called to testify at the Libby trial, and their memories were all over the lot. Former presidential press secretary Ari Fleischer testified under oath that he had not told Washington Post reporter Walter Pincus about Mrs. Wilson. Pincus testified under oath that Fleischer definitely had.
Obviously, one is not telling the truth. But there is no reason to believe that either one is deliberately lying. Pincus and Fleischer are as fallible as any of us. They spend their days receiving and giving information. They can't possibly be expected to remember not only every piece, but precisely when they received every piece.
Should Scooter Libby? He was famously multitasking a large number of national-security and domestic issues, receiving hundreds of pieces of information every day from dozens of sources. Yet special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald chose to make Libby's misstatements about the timing of the receipt of one piece of information — Mrs. Wilson's identity — the great white whale of his multimillion-dollar prosecutorial juggernaut.
Labels: Intelligence War against Bush Admin, Libby, Mark Steyn, Media Bias, State Department Sabotage, Travesty of Justice
Saturday, March 10, 2007
Tom McGuire Fisks TIME Magazine
Labels: Libby, Media Bias, Media War
Thursday, March 08, 2007
What HE Said
Scooter Libby is a convicted perjurer because the United States Department of Justice grossly abused its power and because politics short-circuited all the safeguards that are supposed to prevent such abuses. This is one of the most appalling perversions of a civilized judicial system since France sent Alfred Dreyfus to Devil's Island because the ruling elite didn't like Jews.
If the appellate and executive review processes fail as badly as the investigative and trial processes did in Libby's case, Libby will go to a federal penitentiary because Democrats don't like Republicans. There is enough shame in this outcome to go around.
Patrick Fitzgerald is a disgrace both to the legal profession and to the human race. His partisan allies, such as Senator Chuck Schumer and certain nameless bureaucrats at the CIA, are beneath contempt. The jury was unfit for its task, because it was apparently both prejudiced and intellectually incapable of noticing that the prosecution had no case. The trial judge lacked either the wit to see a gross miscarriage of justice unfolding before his eyes or the courage to stop it. But ultimate responsibility for Fitzgerald's outrageous misconduct lies with his boss.
Labels: CIA Sabotage, Intelligence War against Bush Admin, Libby, Plame
Wednesday, March 07, 2007
Even the WaPo Thinks Libby Trial a Travesty
What an utter disgrace our justice system has become.
UPDATE: From the same source: Libby juror posting at the Huffington Post! Go figure...
Labels: Democrat, Intelligence War against Bush Admin, Libby, Media Bias
Tuesday, March 06, 2007
Travesty of Justice; Ruination of a Decent Public Servant UPDATED
But even more relevant to the notion of "justice served" McGuire's back and forth with Rich Lowry yesterday.
UPDATE: The NRO Editors are saying Pardon Libby now. I agree; this man does not deserve to spend one day in jail. If anyone should be in jail it should be Wilson and Armitage.
But Mark Steyn really nails it here:
I have no idea whether Scooter Libby is a “good man” or a partisan hack, but I certainly hope he has a Bush pardon in his pocket or in his shoes I’d be making a break for the border. I never feel more foreign than when observing contemporary American justice, which seems to the outsider to have absolutely no sense of proportion. Mr Libby has been convicted of lying about his recollection of a conversation. The lies about who leaked Mrs Wilson’s name, the lies about what her husband was told in Niger and what he reported back to the CIA and how he got the job in the first place, all these are still out there. And in particular the leaker Armitage – who remained silent as the drip-drip-drip of speculation corroded the Administration’s integrity month in month out – remains a beloved figure on the social scene, full of delightful asides and amusing gossip. Only the peripheral lie about the minor lie arising from major lies is to be punished.
The Bush Administration can be faulted on several grounds for its conduct here, but one of its earliest errors was apologizing for the notorious “16 words” in the SOTU that started this thing:
''The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."
The British government stands by that statement. So does Lord Butler, in his investigation. In stepping back from the statement, the Administration showed an astonishing political ineptness, and in effect legitimized Wilson’s core grievance. Three years on, meanwhile, MI6, the French and others still know far more about what’s happening on the ground in Africa. The real scandal has always been that the world’s most lavishly endowed intelligence agency’s idea of an investigation is flying in a politically-motivated tourist for a long weekend.
Labels: Intelligence War against Bush Admin, Libby, Plame


































